Epstein files remained a major point of discussion as the first State of the Union address of President Donald Trump’s second term became historic for its length and the debate it sparked. The speech ran for more than 100 minutes, making it the longest State of the Union address in modern history. It covered a wide range of topics, including the economy, immigration, national security, and domestic policy priorities.
Yet, while the address touched many issues, one of the country’s most discussed controversies—the Epstein files—was not mentioned. This absence quickly became a key talking point among lawmakers, journalists, and viewers, especially as pressure continues to grow for the full release of documents connected to Jeffrey Epstein.
Record-Length Address Focuses on Policy but Leaves Out Key Controversy
During the lengthy speech, the president outlined his administration’s agenda and defended policy decisions taken during his time in office. Supporters described the address as detailed and wide-ranging, saying it showed the administration’s direction for the coming year.
Jeffrey Epstein files reveal talks on EMI investment and links to social networks under review
Inside the chamber, reactions were divided. Several Democratic lawmakers wore pins that called for the release of files connected to Epstein, using the message to highlight demands for transparency and support for survivors. Some lawmakers did not attend the speech and instead took part in a livestreamed alternative event that focused on accountability and public trust.
The speech’s historic length drew significant attention on its own. However, the decision not to mention the Epstein files stood out because the topic has remained in headlines. Reports noted that Trump has previously denied wrongdoing and said he was “totally exonerated” by materials already released.
According to reporting referenced by The New York Times, Trump’s name appears numerous times across thousands of documents, though mention in files does not imply guilt. This detail has fueled political debate and calls for clearer explanations from authorities.
Epstein Files Release Process Continues to Face Scrutiny
The Epstein files include millions of pages of interviews, legal records, and investigative material tied to the sex trafficking case involving the late financier. Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in late 2025, requiring authorities to release the documents to the public.
Since then, files have been released gradually, with many pages heavily redacted to remove identifying details. Lawmakers who were allowed to view some unredacted materials described the process as complex due to the volume of records.
Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin said that while millions of documents have been released, millions more remain withheld. He suggested that the delay may be linked to the involvement of powerful individuals named in the records, raising concerns about whether disclosure has been slowed intentionally.
Government officials have maintained that the process must follow legal guidelines. They say some documents cannot be released immediately because they involve privacy protections, legal privilege, or ongoing federal investigations.
New Reports Intensify Political Pressure on the Justice Department
Shortly before the State of the Union, reporting from NPR suggested that some documents may have been withheld despite earlier claims from Attorney General Pam Bondi that all responsive materials had been released. The report referenced FBI interview notes, including allegations connected to Trump that were recorded during earlier investigations.
In response, the Department of Justice stated that materials were not deleted and that some details were temporarily removed to protect victims. Officials said documents are restored once redactions are reviewed and legal requirements are met. They emphasized that withheld items may include duplicates, privileged information, or records tied to active investigations.
House rebels against Trump as tariffs rule collapses in narrow vote
The debate over the files has continued both inside and outside Congress. Some lawmakers brought alleged victims to the State of the Union as a way to draw attention to the issue, while advocacy groups called for faster disclosure.
Trump has continued to distance himself from the controversy, repeating that released evidence cleared him of wrongdoing. At the same time, critics argue that full transparency is necessary for public trust.
The historic speech, combined with ongoing disputes over document releases, kept the Epstein files at the center of national political discussion even without a direct mention during the address.
