Home English Security Court record for January 6 suspect Taylor Taranto — the one arrested...

Court record for January 6 suspect Taylor Taranto — the one arrested near Obama’s home — suddenly vanishes

0
21
Vanishing justice: DOJ quietly deletes Taylor Taranto court record tied to Obama threat case

Washington, D.C. is facing new questions about transparency inside the Department of Justice after a sudden deletion of a key court record involving Taylor Taranto, a man linked to the January 6 Capitol riot. Taranto was arrested in 2023 near former President Barack Obama’s home after police found two guns, a machete, and hundreds of rounds of ammunition in his van.

Before his arrest, Taranto had livestreamed himself driving through Obama’s neighborhood. During the stream, he made a false bomb threat and said he was on a “one-way mission”. Police intervened quickly and took him into custody. His arrest came just hours after Donald Trump posted Obama’s home address on his social media account, raising alarms about how Taranto obtained the location.

Taranto had been among roughly 1,500 people pardoned by Trump for their roles in the January 6 attack. That pardon cleared his earlier charges but did not apply to his later conduct near Obama’s residence. His new actions—threatening behavior, weapons possession, and a bomb hoax—led to separate federal charges.

California erupts as Trump’s DOJ sends federal election monitors — Newsom calls it voter intimidation

DOJ Prosecutors File and Lose Key Memo

Following his conviction, prosecutors Samuel White and Carlos Valdivia from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington filed a detailed sentencing memo recommending a 27-month prison term. The document described Taranto’s behavior as dangerous and said it caused the evacuation of an entire neighborhood. It also mentioned his lack of remorse and his earlier involvement in the Capitol riot, calling the crowd that day a “mob of rioters”.

The memo was part of the public record—until it wasn’t. Within a day, it vanished from the court docket without any notice. Reporters discovered that a new version had quietly replaced it. The updated file removed all references to Taranto’s January 6 involvement and to Trump’s online post revealing Obama’s address. The language was softened, leaving only a basic account of Taranto’s more recent crimes.

Apple Bows to Trump Administration, Pulls ICEBlock App After DOJ and FBI Pressure

Around the same time, both White and Valdivia were placed on leave. Their government access was suspended, and their names were removed from later court filings. The Department of Justice (DOJ) offered no explanation for either the deletion or the sudden personnel change.

Concerns Over Transparency and Independence

The unusual disappearance of an official court document has raised serious concerns about transparency within the DOJ. Court filings are considered part of the permanent public record, and changes without explanation are extremely rare. Legal experts warn that altering or removing such documents undermines public confidence in the justice system.

Kamala Harris slams DOJ’s impartiality, calls Trump-era prosecutions politically motivated

NBC News reporter Ken Dilanian and Politico journalist Kyle Cheney both confirmed the document’s deletion and replacement. Dilanian called the move “Orwellian”, pointing out that the new memo erased key context about Taranto’s motives and history. Cheney noted that the revised version was filed late at night and made no mention of Trump’s involvement or Taranto’s Jan. 6 background.

The DOJ has not commented publicly on who ordered the change or why the prosecutors were sidelined. The lack of clarity has fueled speculation about internal pressure and possible political interference. Observers say it’s highly unusual for career prosecutors to face disciplinary action after filing a standard sentencing memo.

For now, Taylor Taranto remains convicted for the crimes committed near Barack Obama’s home. But the vanishing of his sentencing memo and the suspension of the prosecutors have deepened public concern over how justice is being handled inside one of America’s most powerful institutions.

error: Content is protected !!