The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently conducted search and seizure operations on Quant Mutual Fund, owned by Sandeep Tandon. Suspecting front-running activities, the regulator’s actions spanned across two key locations—Mumbai and Hyderabad. This development has raised significant concerns within the mutual fund industry and among investors.
Search and Seizure Operations
The operations took place at Quant Mutual Fund’s headquarters in Mumbai and Hyderabad suspected to be connected through beneficial ownership. On Friday, Sebi officials questioned Quant dealers and other individuals linked to the case. These actions indicate Sebi’s intent to uncover and address any potential illegal trading practices within the fund.
Quant Mutual Fund’s Response
Quant Mutual Fund remained silent initially, not responding to queries sent on Friday. However, following the publication of the Moneycontrol story, the mutual fund reached out to its investors via email on Sunday evening. The email reassured investors of the fund’s commitment to cooperating with SEBI. “We would like to reassure you that Quant Mutual Fund is a regulated organization and that we will always work together with the regulator on any review. We will provide all necessary support and continue to furnish data to SEBI on a regular and as-needed,” the email stated. Attempts to get a response from SEBI were unsuccessful.
Background and Growth of Quant Mutual Fund
Founded by Sandeep Tandon, Quant Mutual Fund received its license from SEBI in 2017. Since then, it has experienced exponential growth, with assets under management (AUM) soaring from approximately Rs 100 crore in 2019 to over Rs 90,000 crore currently. In January of this year, the fund managed a portfolio of 26 schemes and 54 lakh folios, surpassing Rs 50,000 crore in assets.The performance of its small-cap fund has been particularly noteworthy By managing more than Rs 20,000 crore and delivering an annualized return of 45% over the past five years, significantly outperforming the category average of 31%.
SEBI Crackdown on Front-Running
SEBI has intensified its crackdown on front-running mutual funds. This illegal practice involves fund managers, dealers, or brokers placing their own orders ahead of large trades to profit from the subsequent price movement. The regulator’s increased search and seizure operations aim to gather concrete evidence. Also to dismantle complex transactions that often escape scrutiny due to the high burden of proof required by law.
Details of the Allegations by SEBI
While two sources confirmed that the case against Quant Mutual Fund involves front-running, the exact nature of the allegations remains unclear. One source estimated the alleged profits from these operations to be around Rs 20 crore. It is still uncertain whether the management of Quant Mutual Fund is complicit or if the charges pertain solely to external parties.
Previous Front-Running Cases
This isn’t SEBI’s first foray into tackling front-running within the mutual fund industry. The regulator previously barred Viresh Joshi, a fund manager at Axis Mutual Fund, along with 20 entities linked to him, for front-running activities. SEBI ordered the impoundment of Rs 30.55 crore after identifying it as ill-gotten income from these operations.
Understanding Front-Running
Front-running is an unethical and illegal trading practice. Where insiders use knowledge of upcoming large trades to place their own orders first. Thus reaping profits from the subsequent market movement. This can be executed in various ways, including purchasing large blocks of stock through undercover personal accounts before moving them to the fund account. Thus leading to higher acquisition prices for the mutual fund. These transactions are notoriously difficult to trace, often conducted through accounts not directly linked to the perpetrators.
Implications and Future Outlook
The search and seizure operations at Quant Mutual Fund highlight SEBI’s determination to enforce stringent regulations and ensure fair market practices. This incident serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability within the mutual fund industry. Investors and industry stakeholders will be closely monitoring the developments in this case and Sebi’s subsequent actions.
Conclusion
SEBI’s investigation into Quant Mutual Fund’s suspected front-running activities underscores the regulator’s commitment to maintaining integrity in the financial markets. As the probe unfolds, it will be crucial for mutual funds to uphold ethical practices. And for regulatory bodies to continue their vigilance in protecting investor interests. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the mutual fund industry and the broader financial market landscape.
